🔗 Share this article

UN's top security body has approved a US-backed resolution that supports Moroccan claim regarding the disputed Western Sahara, notwithstanding significant opposition from Algeria.

Divided Vote Strengthens Moroccan Stance

While the recent decision was divided, the resolution constitutes the most significant support yet for Moroccan plan to maintain control over the territory, which additionally enjoys support from the majority of European Union members and a growing number of African nation partners.

Resolution Structure and Key Components

The document refers to Moroccan proposal as a foundation for talks. As with previous measures, the document makes no mention of a vote on independence that includes independence as an choice, which represents the solution long favored by the pro-independence Polisario Front and its supporters.

Genuine self-rule under Morocco's authority could represent a most practical resolution.

Background Context

The territory is a phosphate-rich area of coastline arid land the size of a US state which was under Spanish control until 1975. It is claimed by both Morocco and the Polisario Front, which operates from temporary settlements in southwestern neighboring Algeria and claims to speak for the indigenous people indigenous to the contested territory.

Decision Patterns and International Responses

The US, which sponsored the measure, led eleven nations in voting in support, while 3 countries – multiple nations – declined to vote. The neighboring country, Polisario's main supporter, did not participate.

Mike Waltz, the US representative to the United Nations, said the decision had been "significant" and would "build on the momentum for a much-delayed resolution in Western Sahara".

Amar Bendjama, the Algeria's representative to the UN, said that while the resolution was an advancement on previous iterations, it "still has a series of deficiencies".

Peacekeeping Operation and Future Assessment

The resolution also extends the United Nations security mission in the territory for another year, as has been implemented for over thirty years. Prior renewals, though, have not contained a reference to Moroccan and its allies' preferred outcome.

The UN resolution calls on all sides participating to "take this unprecedented chance for a lasting peace." Depending on progress, it asks the UN leader to review the operation's mandate within six months.

Area Impact and Present Situation

The change could disrupt a long-stalled situation that for many years has eluded resolution, notwithstanding a United Nations peacekeeping operation that was intended to be short-term. Demonstrations have followed in Sahrawi refugee camps in Algeria this recent period, where people have vowed not to abandon their fight for self-determination.

Morocco administers almost all of the territory, except for a thin strip called the "liberated area" that lies to the east of a constructed by Morocco sand wall.

Historical Background and Recent Events

A 1991-era truce was meant to facilitate a referendum on self-determination, but disagreements over participation criteria blocked it from occurring.

Through time, Morocco has developed the disputed territory, constructing a maritime facility and a long road. State subsidies keep food and energy prices low, and the population has ballooned as Moroccan citizens settle in cities such as major settlements.

Polisario ended the ceasefire in recent years after clashes near a road Morocco was constructing to Mauritania.

The group has subsequently frequently reported military operations, while Morocco has mostly rejected claims of active fighting. The United Nations calls it "limited tensions".

Global Diplomacy and Coming Prospects

In response to the draft resolution, Polisario stated that it would not participate in any process intending "to 'legitimise' Moroccan unauthorized military occupation," adding peace "cannot happen by rewarding territorial claims".

The conflict represents the central issue in regional diplomacy. Morocco considers endorsement of its proposal as a standard for how it gauges its allies.

Last October, the UN representative proposed partitioning the territory, a suggestion neither side agreed to. He urged the government to clarify what self-rule would entail and warned that a absence of progress might question the United Nations' role and "whether there is space and readiness for us to still be useful."

The push to review the United Nations Mission comes as the US reduces funding for United Nations initiatives and agencies, including security operations.