🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities will be slashed by more than half, following a controversial law change that forced municipal councils to put the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have multiple councillors based on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by first putting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities frequently devoted considerable time generating local support and urging their councils to establish Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed local councils to set up a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the current administration overturned the policy, stating local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change mandated local authorities that had established a ward under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which ended on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 voted to keep their seats, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

The results represented “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Opposition parties however have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to measures intended to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has stated it aims to end “race-based” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven cities required to vote supported Māori wards, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

This year’s local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with under one-third of citizens participating, prompting demands for reform.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are able to establish other types of wards – such as rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements applied to Māori wards indicated the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark referred to the 17 areas that voted to retain their seats.